CommentariesJUNE 10, 2024

INDIA IN THE INDO-PACIFIC: STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE AND GEOPOLITICAL DYNAMICS

Team Red Lantern Analytica

Directorate of Intelligence

INTRODUCTION
The Indo-Pacific region has emerged as a critical arena for geopolitical and strategic engagements in the 21st century. India, with its significant geographical positioning, burgeoning economy and evolving foreign policy, has become a pivotal player in this dynamic landscape. This article explores India’s strategic realignment in the Indo-Pacific, examining its policies, alliances and challenges in navigating this complex and often contentious region. The analysis delves into historical contexts, current strategic frameworks, and future implications of India’s Indo-Pacific strategy, providing a comprehensive understanding of its role and aspirations.

The concept of the Indo-Pacific has gained prominence in international relations discourse, reflecting the interconnectedness of the Indian and Pacific Oceans as a single strategic entity. This region encompasses some of the world’s most significant sea lanes, facilitating the bulk of global maritime trade. The Indo-Pacific is not merely a geographical construct but a strategic space defined by the interactions of major global and regional powers. India, situated at the crossroads of this region, has increasingly aligned its strategic outlook with the Indo-Pacific framework. This shift signifies a departure from its traditional focus on South Asia and a response to the evolving geopolitical landscape characterized by the rise of China and the strategic interests of other major powers like the United States, Japan, and Australia. Historically, India’s peninsular configuration, surrounded by three waters with a coastline stretching over 7,500 km, has made it a natural maritime power. The Indian Ocean, the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal have been crucial conduits for trade, cultural exchanges, and strategic interactions. This legacy of maritime engagement dates back to ancient times when Indian merchants and sailors traversed these waters, establishing trade links with Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Arabian Peninsula.

India’s engagement with the Indo-Pacific is rooted in its historical maritime traditions and colonial past. The Indian Ocean, often regarded as India’s strategic backyard, has long been a conduit for trade, cultural exchange, and influence. Post-independence, India’s foreign policy was primarily shaped by non-alignment and a focus on regional stability. However, the end of the Cold War and the onset of globalization necessitated a reorientation of its strategic priorities. The Look East Policy, initiated in the early 1990s, marked the beginning of India’s strategic outreach to Southeast Asia and beyond. This policy laid the groundwork for India’s current Indo-Pacific strategy, emphasizing economic integration, maritime security, and diplomatic engagement. In the contemporary era, India’s strategic orientation towards the Indo-Pacific has been shaped by several historical milestones. The end of British colonial rule in 1947 marked the beginning of India’s independent foreign policy, initially characterized by non-alignment and a focus on regional solidarity which led to a more pronounced engagement with the Indo-Pacific.

STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INDO-PACIFIC
The Indo-Pacific region holds immense strategic significance for India for several reasons. Firstly, the region is a hub of global maritime trade, with critical sea lanes of communication (SLOCs) passing through it. These SLOCs, including the Straits of Malacca, Lombok and Sunda, are vital for the flow of energy, goods, and resources. As a net importer of energy, goods and resources. As a net importer of energy, India’s economic security is intrinsically linked to the stability and security of these maritime routes.

Secondly, the Indo-Pacific region is characterized by a dynamic and evolving security architecture. The rise of China and its assertive policies, including the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the militarization of the South China Sea, pose significant strategic challenges. India’s strategic calculus in the Indo-Pacific is influenced by the need to counterbalance China’s growing influence and ensure a stable and multipolar regional order.

Thirdly, the Indo-Pacific is home to a diverse array of political, economic and cultural entities. This diversity presents both opportunities and challenges for India. On one hand, it allows India to forge strategic partnerships with like-minded countries such as Japan, Australia, and ASEAN nations. On the other hand, it necessitates a nuanced and flexible foreign policy approach to navigate the complex regional dynamics.

INDIA’S INDO-PACIFIC STRATEGY
India’s Indo-Pacific strategy is multifaceted, encompassing diplomatic, economic, and military dimensions. At the core of this strategy is the vision of a free, open and inclusive Indo-Pacific strategy that is multifaceted, encompassing diplomatic, economic and military dimensions and articulated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue in 2018. This vision emphasizes respect for sovereignty, international law and a rules-based order.

Diplomatically, India has sought to enhance its engagements with key regional actors and multilateral institutions. The Act East Policy, a cornerstone of India’s foreign policy, aims to strengthen economic and strategic ties with Southeast Asian countries. This policy has evolved from the earlier Look East Policy, reflecting a more proactive and assertive approach.

India has also deepened its strategic partnerships with major Indo-Pacific powers. The Quad, comprising India, the United States, Japan and Australia, represents a significant diplomatic initiative aimed at promoting security and stability in the region. The Quad’s agenda includes maritime security and disaster relief, reflecting a comprehensive approach to regional challenges.

In addition to the Quad, India has engaged with regional forums such as the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), East Asia Summit (EAS), and the India Ocean Rim Association (IORA). These multilateral engagements underscore India’s commitment to a cooperative and inclusive regional order.

Economically, India has sought to leverage its strategic location and burgeoning market potential to enhance regional connectivity and trade. The development of infrastructure projects such as the Sagarmala initiative, aimed at modernizing India’s port infrastructure, and the Bharatmala project, focused on improving road connectivity, are integral to India’s Indo-Pacific strategy. These initiatives aim to bolster India’s role as a regional hub for trade and logistics.

India has also pursued bilateral and multilateral trade agreements to enhance economic integration with the Indo-Pacific region. The Indian-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement and the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreements (CEPAs) with countries such as Japan and South Korea are indicative of this approach. Furthermore, India’s involvement in regional economic frameworks such as the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) negotiations reflects its commitment to fostering economic ties, although it opted out of the RCEP due to concerns over market access and trade imbalances.

On the military front, India has significantly enhanced its maritime capabilities and strategic reach. The Indian Navy’s modernization and expansion are central to India’s Indo-Pacific strategy. Initiatives such as the commissioning of new aircraft carriers, submarines and advanced warships are aimed at ensuring a credible and effective maritime presence. The establishment of the Andaman and Nicobar Command, India’s only tri-services command, underscores the strategic importance of the eastern Indian Ocean and the Andaman Sea.

India has also intensified its defense cooperation with key Indo-Pacific partners. Bilateral naval exercises such as the Malabar Exercise with key Indo-Pacific partners, AUSINDEX with Australia, and SIMBEX with Singapore, as well as multilateral exercises like the MILAN, enhance interoperability and strategic coordination. These exercises not only demonstrate India’s maritime capabilities but also signal its commitment to regional security.

The development of strategic military facilitates and agreements further bolster India’s strategic posture. Agreements such as the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA) with the U.S., the Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) with Japan, and the Mutual Logistics Support Agreement (MLSA) with Australia facilitate logistical support and operational cooperation, enhancing India’s strategic reach and sustainability in the Indo-Pacific.

India’s engagement with the Indo-Pacific is not without challenges. The foremost challenge is the rise of China and its assertive policies in the region. China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea, its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its growing military capabilities pose significant strategic challenges for India. Balancing cooperation and competition with China remain a delicate task for Indian policymakers.

Another challenge is the complex and diverse political landscape of the Indo-Pacific. The region encompasses a wide array of political systems, economic models and cultural contexts. Navigating these cultural contexts. Navigating these complexities requires a nuanced and adaptable foreign policy approach. India must balance its relations with various regional actors, ensuring that its engagements are seen as inclusive and non-confrontational

The economic dimension also presents both opportunities and challenges. While the Indo-Pacific region offers vast economic potential, issues such as trade imbalances, protectionist policies, and infrastructural bottlenecks need to be addressed. Enhancing regional connectivity, ensuring equitable trade relations, and fostering economic integration are key to realizing the economic potential of the Indo-Pacific.

Opportunities for India in the Indo-Pacific are manifold. The region’s strategic importance offers India a platform to enhance its global standing and influence. By positioning itself as a key player in the Indo-Pacific, India can leverage its strategic location, democratic values, and economic potential to foster regional stability and prosperity.

The Indo-Pacific also offers opportunities for India to deepen its strategic partnerships. The Quad, for instance, provides a platform for India to collaborate with like-minded democracies on issues of mutual concern. Enhanced defense cooperation, intelligence sharing, and joint strategic initiatives with Indo-Pacific partners can bolster India’s security and strategic posture.

FUTURE PROSPECTS
The future of India’s Indo-Pacific strategy hinges on its ability to navigate these challenges and leverage its strengths. The future of India’s role in the Indo-Pacific will be shaped by several factors. Firstly, the evolving geopolitical landscape, particularly the U.S.-China strategic competition, will significantly influence India’s strategic choices. India’s ability to navigate this complex dynamic and maintain strategic autonomy will be crucial.

Secondly, India’s domestic capabilities will play a critical role. Economic growth, technological advancements and military modernization are essential for India to project power and influence in the Indo-Pacific. Strengthening domestic capabilities will enhance India’s strategic leverage and enable it to play a more proactive role in regional affairs.

Thirdly, regional cooperation and multilateralism will be key to India’s Indo-Pacific strategy. Engaging with regional forums, fostering economic integration, and enhancing strategic partnerships will be central to India’s approach. Building a network of strategic partnerships will be central to India’s approach.

Moreover, strengthening strategic partnerships will remain a priority for India. The Quad is likely to play a central role in this regard, with potential expansions to include other like-minded countries. Enhancing bilateral and multilateral defense cooperation, particularly in areas such as Maritime Domain Awareness, cyber security and counterterrorism, will be crucial. India’s engagements with ASEAN, IORA, and other regional organizations will continue to provide platforms for dialogue and cooperation.

Economic integration with the Indo-Pacific region will be a key focus for India. Enhancing connectivity through initiatives like the Asia-Africa Growth Corridor (AAGC) and participating in regional trade agreements can boost India’s economic footprint. Infrastructure development, particularly in maritime and digital domains, will be essential to support these efforts. Additionally, fostering innovation and technology partnerships can drive economic growth and create new avenues for collaboration.

Maintaining maritime dominance in the Indian Ocean will be critical for India’s strategic interests. This involves not only enhancing naval capabilities but also developing comprehensive maritime policies that address issues such as blue economy, environmental sustainability, and maritime dominance in the Indian Ocean will be critical for India’s strategic interests. This involves not only enhancing naval capabilities but also developing comprehensive maritime policies that address issues such as blue economy, environmental sustainability, and maritime governance4. India’s leadership in initiatives like the Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI) reflects its commitment to promoting a rules-based maritime order.

Diplomatic agility will be essential for India to navigate the complexities of the Indo-Pacific. This involves maintaining a pragmatic and flexible approach to regional engagements, leveraging its soft power, and building coalitions on shared interests. India’s role as a net security provider and a proponent of inclusive regional architecture will reinforce its strategic relevance.

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, India’s role in the Indo-Pacific is pivotal to the region’s strategic landscape. As a major maritime power with a strategic location, India’s engagement with the Indo-Pacific is driven by historical legacies, economic imperatives, and security considerations. The challenges and opportunities in the region necessitate a comprehensive and proactive approach, encompassing diplomatic, economic, and military dimensions. By leveraging its strengths and fostering strategic partnerships, India can play a crucial role in ensuring a stable, prosperous, and inclusive Indo-Pacific.

India’s evolving role in the Indo-Pacific represents a strategic realignment driven by the imperatives of securing its maritime interests, counterbalancing China’s influence, and fostering regional stability. While significant challenges remain, India’s proactive engagement, strategic partnerships, and emphasis on economic integration and maritime security position it as a key player in the region. The success of India’s Indo-Pacific strategy will depend on its ability to navigate the complex geopolitical landscape, leverage its strengths, and sustain its strategic initiatives. As the Indo-Pacific continues to shape the contours of the global geopolitical landscape, leverage its strengths, and sustain its strategic initiatives. As the Indo-Pacific continues to shape the contours of global geopolitics, India’s role will be pivotal in ensuring a stable and secure regional order.

REFERENCES

Brewster, D. (2014). India’s Ocean: The Story of India’s Bid for Regional Leadership.
Chaudhuri, R., & Kalyanaraman, S. (2019). India and the Indo-Pacific: In Pursuit of a New World Order.
Grare, F., & Mattoo, A. (Eds.). (2013). India and the World: International Relations and Security Perspectives. HarperCollins India.
Kapila, S. (2018). India’s Foreign Policy in the 21^st Pentagon Press.
Malik, M. (2012). China and India: Great power Rivals. Lynne Riener Publishers.
Pant, H. V. (2019). New Directions in India’s Foreign Policy: Theory and Praxis. Cambridge University Press.
Scoot, D. (2012). Handbook of India’s International Relations

AUTHOR
Akanksha Pal
RLA Research intern

Related Intelligence

COMMENTARIESAUGUST 20, 2026

Evergrande’s Fall Exposes the Deeper Fault Lines in China’s Property-Led Growth Model

The sentencing of Hui Ka Yan, Xu Jiayin, founder of the China Evergrande Group, to life in prison marks the conclusion of more than just the fall of one of China’s biggest businessmen. Hui was found guilty of eight offenses, including fraud, misappropriation of funds, securities violations, and bribery. Evergrande, formerly the largest real estate developer in China by contracted sales, turned to almost all of its $300 billion plus liabilities. Hui’s trial may mark the end of a significant legal case, but the Evergrande case does not end the massive economic case Evergrande came to represent. China’s real estate bubble was not a tale of just increasing house prices. It involved a tightly connected system of households, developers, banks, and local governments. Property became the main wealth purchasing and saving vehicle for Chinese households. In a survey by the People’s Bank of China, 59.1% of urban households’ assets were held in the form of housing, and the home ownership rate was 96%. Increasing house prices had an effect beyond an increase in construction. House prices had a positive effect on household wealth perceptions, confidence, and consumption. For developers, the system was designed to incentivize expansion. Land was bought and presold apartments, loans made it possible for developers to start new projects, and growing property evaluations enabled more borrowing. Evergrande was one of the developers who pushed the system the farthest. It can be described as the “three highs” consisting of high turnover, high costs, and high leverage. Evergrande’s model was to raise capital, buy land on a massive scale, and begin development while also borrowing against their land and starting the cycle over. So long as lenders continued to lend and buyers continued to buy, investors and developers alike continued to benefit from the cycle and the land and housing prices continued to grow. Local government interests were aligned with the developers. After the 1994 tax-sharing reform, the central government gained more revenue, leaving local governments shouldering a greater financial burden. To offset some of the burden, local governments sold land to developers and used land as collateral for loans. By 2019, it is calculated that local governments’ reliance on land finance was at 38.6 percent, with over 50 percent in many large cities. Property prices and local government finance and debt fuelled a cycle of increasing infrastructure spending. This outlines how vital property investment became for China. The IMF put the contribution of property to the economy at up to 20 percent. However, this number does not even come close to capturing the extent of property’s reach. Building property creates the need for the transport of raw materials. That includes steel, cement, and glass, as well as the machines to build the property, appliances, and furniture. Glass and machinery need to be transported using logistics and financial services. Property building employs contractors. Developers take out mortgages and corporate loans. Local governments earn money from the sale of land. So, property not only includes one of many sectors of the economy, but becomes a complete economic system. It becomes very clear how this system would collapse if the opposite of what is expected were to occur. This is the nature of a bubble. Every apartment does not become worthless. It means that the cost of the property, along with construction and the loans used to finance the purchase, became more dependent on whether people thought the price and demand for property would continue to rise. If people begin to think the cost of property will fall, then the same thing happens in the opposite order. Buyers will delay purchases, developers will not earn presale income, government revenue will fall, and banks will be more cautious of extending loans. Beijing recognized the risks so they began to tighten financial regulations starting in 2016. In 2020, The “Three Red Lines” Framework was established. Beijing’s goal was to limit debt for highly leveraged developers. From a macroeconomic standpoint it was necessary to limit debt. The problem was that leverage had become endemic throughout the system. It was really wishful thinking that it would discipline poorly managed developers because it made the business models of other driven companies more dependent on constantly selling new property and taking out new loans to continuously refinance debt. Evergrande exemplified the most famous case of China’s real estate collapse. Their failure impacted far more than themselves. Suppliers weren’t getting paid, construction companies went bankrupt and halted their projects, buyers had to wait to get their newly financed homes, and the creditors began to doubt the feasibility of their investments. Media states that Evergrande’s liquidation is slow and only $255 million of assets were sold by August of 2025 with claims against those assets totalling $45 billion. The possibility of China suffering a sudden replication of America’s 2008 “Lehman moment” is low. China’s financial system is more state-controlled, and the major banks are capable of being directed to provide support. Further, the capacity of Beijing to avoid excessive failure is far higher than the capacity of America at that same part in its history. The more likely threat is a prolonged balance-sheet adjustment where weakness in the property market will slow economic activity for many years. This trend continues through 2026. In July, Chinese new-home prices fell by 3.2% compared to the previous year. Of the 70 cities monitored, only 17 showed an increase in prices from the previous month. The first 7 months of the year also showed declining trends in property sales, investment, and new construction. During this period, the revenue of the Chinese government from land sales declined by 31.5% and was recorded at 977.8 billion yuan. These figures show a weakening trend in property and reflect declining private investment and local government finances. This trend is most problematic for households. When the primary investment of a household falls in value, households become more conservative. Household wealth falls and household members that own houses feel poorer, even if they have no intention of selling.

Team Red Lantern AnalyticaAnalyst

arrow_outward

COMMENTARIESJULY 25, 2026

𝐀 𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐇𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 – 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐜𝐲 𝐯𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲: 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐍𝐒𝐂𝐍 (𝐈𝐌) & 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐌𝐲𝐚𝐧𝐦𝐚𝐫

N𝐞𝐰 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 | 𝐑𝐞𝐝 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐀𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚 Red Lantern Analytica presents a new strategic analysis: “𝐀 𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐇𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 – 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐜𝐲 𝐯𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲: 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐍𝐒𝐂𝐍 (𝐈𝐌) & 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐌𝐲𝐚𝐧𝐦𝐚𝐫.” Authored by Lt. Col. Ujjual Abhishek Jha, DCPP (Retd.), this examines the recent organisational split within NSCN (IM), the emergence of the Eastern Flank-led Provisional Government, and its implications for the Naga peace process, cross-border insurgency, and India’s security landscape in the Northeast. Download Link: A Divided House Legacy vs Reality Fracture in NSCM-IM and Rise of the Rival Provisional Government in Myanmar

Team Red Lantern AnalyticaAnalyst

arrow_outward

COMMENTARIESAUGUST 21, 2025

Reimagining Oman as an Indian Ocean Green Hub: Looking at a Post-Carbon Future

The few stereotypes that persist regarding the Gulf are of its importance as a hydrocarbon centre over the past eight decades, since Bahrain and Saudi Arabia struck Oil in the 1930s. Oman, in comparison, struck Oil in Fahud in 1962, and shipped its first container from Mina Al Fahal in 1967. The oil revenues formed the bedrock of rebuilding the country during the 1970s, during which the Dhofar rebellion was still on. Oman is a Shell country, like Brunei, where Shell has been strategic in the country’s hydrocarbon exploration through a major stake in Petroleum Development Oman, or PDO, as commonly known. Many PDO employees have worked for Shell Brunei and Shell Sarawak as a part of their career circulations in the global MNC network. Oman was never a massive producer of petroleum as its wealthier neighbours in the GCC, even though its natural gas imprint is significant. Natural Gas is a key transition fuel, and Quriyat LNG in Sur has many long-term contracts with Korea, China, and Japan. However, Oil and Gas still form a major chunk of the GDP in Oman. Diversification has been on the agenda since the late 1980s, as localisation has always been a priority. Years of peak oil prices have led to the creation of avant-garde infrastructure and the education of a couple of generations overseas on scholarships, which was a byproduct of oil income. Now, the scenario has evolved as Oman’s population has increased, and the youth seeking work is often the refrain, as gauged from the comments section in the social media feeds. The cause of the Arab Spring protests in Sohar was corruption and lack of jobs, which led to a few heads turning. The post Sultan Qaboos era, under the able leadership of His Majesty Sultan Haitham Bin Tarik has moved towards diversification in a major way, seeking relationships far and wide. His Majesty has had meetings with the Dutch Leadership, President Putin in Moscow, Prime Minister Modi in Delhi, and the UK Minister Starmer within the past few months. The rich legacy of Oman being the Switzerland of the Middle East helps in its vital role in mediating the Yemeni crisis and as a trusted participant in the Iran paradigm, helps. Oman also controls half of the crucial Straits of Hormuz. Ibadhi Oman’s history as a littoral maritime empire has its long shadow in the present. Muscat is a diverse place, full of Zanzibaris, Baluchis, Ajmi’s, Lawati’s, and Hindu Bania’s, and other communities who were a part of the Omani imperial grid. The strategic culture of the Omani elite is transnational, with many Omani having ties across East Africa to Africa. Pankaj Khimji, an advisor to the Omani government, is a key Bania interlocuter between Muscat and Delhi via Mandvi. India and Oman have finalised the FTA negotiations recently. Aden was governed by the Bombay Presidency until 1937. These close ties entail prospects of power being exported to India/ Pakistan/East Africa via a subsea cable in the future. The engineering and program management excellence achieved by the national building efforts of PDO, especially in terms of talent development for the renewable sector, over the past decades. The first solar project was helmed by PDO as seen in the Amin Solar project. This is similar to the Aramco State, where the best expertise in Saudi Arabia lies with the engineers in the oil major. A glimpse of it was illustrated in Ellen R Wald’s book[1], which showed the role National Oil Companies have played in nation-building. Oman’s location as an Indian Ocean actor was confirmed with it hosting the Indian Ocean Conference this year in Muscat, where Member of Parliament Naveen Jindal ji spoke. Jindal operates one of the largest steel mills in the Middle East in Sohar. The ACME Group is coming up with a green hydrogen facility in the special economic zone in Duqm on the Arabian Sea coast. Duqm is also home to a naval base, which plays host to many navies, as it is close to the Horn of Africa piracy corridor. The green hydrogen corridor in Al Wusta and Dhofar is underway as ACWA Power from Saudi Arabia is investing in a green hydrogen facility in the southern Dhofar region. Another ACWA Power project in the form of Ibri 2 IPP is a project I know rather intimately. I was the lead social specialist for an impact assessment report for a multi-million-dollar 500MW solar park on the Saudi border. Long-term migrant workers from South Asia were identified as camel farmers in the desert on project land., However, during a recce visit and after speaking to long-term migrant workers looking after camels, we discovered that they were extremely precarious, relying on a solar-powered battery charger for mobile phones and to light a bulb. These workers, who were heavily reliant on precarious work, were being moved away from their off-grid homes to build a Chinese-funded solar park in relatively prosperous Oman. The irony was not lost on me. Globally accepted ESG governance norms kicked in, the move triggered an independent Resettlement Action Plan for these workers. Climate and Local developmental politics intersect in the middle of nowhere. The Beijing-based Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank or AIIB is the backer for the Ibri 2 Project, and Chinese contractors were the hands on Ibri 2. Belt and Road is right on our doorstep. Indian Engineers and Consultants work on these Chinese-funded projects as the technical hands behind the scenes. There are numerous other solar projects in the pipeline in the Wilayat of Manah. These areas are close to the Saudi Border and could be a part of an integrated GCC power grid. Oman’s great strength in terms of land needed for renewable projects is a plus, along with its positioning between the Gulf, South Asia, and East Africa, which makes it an Indian Ocean Green Hub[2] in the making. [1] https://www.amazon.in/Saudi-Inc-Arabian-Kingdom%60s-Pursuit/dp/168177660X [2] https://mem.gov.om/en-us/Our-Business/Renewable-Energy-and-Hydrogen/Renewable-Energy-and-Hydrogen-Projects Authored By: Manishankar Prasad PhD Scholar, University of Malaya

Team Red Lantern AnalyticaAnalyst

arrow_outward