Beyond New Delhi: The Expanding Role of Indian States in Global Diplomacy
Opinions

Beyond New Delhi: The Expanding Role of Indian States in Global Diplomacy

TR

Team Red Lantern Analytica

Directorate of Intelligence

Share:

Introduction

In the past three decades, India’s foreign policy has witnessed significant changes. The economic reforms of 1991, the rise of regional parties and strong regional leaders and several other factors have meant that India’s states have emerged as stakeholders in India’s external outreach – especially the economic aspect[i]. This phenomenon is global and is referred to as para-diplomacy[ii].

While the economic reforms of 1991 and the India’s remarkable achievements in the realm of Information Technology, in the 1990’s and 2000’s, gave a key push to participation of states in India’s economic diplomacy, the rise of strong leaders like Chandrababu Naidu (currently CM of Andhra Pradesh) was also an important factor. Naidu during his tenure as CM of erstwhile AP in the 1990’s and early 2000’s and both his terms (2014-2019, 2024-) as CM of the newly carved out state of AP has been pro-active in reaching out to investors. While during his first term, Naidu reached out to IT giants and was credited for making Hyderabad – now the capital of Telangana into an IT Hub[iii] – as CM of AP he has been reaching out to foreign investors and governments for the development of Amaravati as well as Vaishakhapatnam[iv]. The past decade has also witnessed a growing trend of state investor summits. While PM Modi as CM of Gujarat had started the Vibrant Gujarat Summit, almost all states host Investors Summits – with an eye on drawing foreign direct investments.

One of the important steps taken by the current government to improve coordination between the centre and the states is the setting up of the States Division in the MEA.

There has also been talk of ‘competitive federalism’ between states. The PM himself has often spoken about competitive and cooperative federalism.

After the signing of an FTA between India and UAE, state governments – including West Bengal, Maharashtra[v] and Tamil Nadu — are also trying to strengthen their trade linkages. UAE itself has been reaching out pro-actively to several states for strengthening economic linkages.

While para-diplomacy is a reality and there is no doubt that states have become more pro-active. A few points need to be borne in mind. First, despite there being many mechanisms it is important to have better coordination between the centre and statesand to ensure that politics does not come in the way of issues pertaining to development. Second, in a changing geopolitical and economic situation coordination between centre and states is essential. For instance, on the issue of tariffs imposed by the US on India, there is need for better coordination similarly the decision of the Trump Administration to raise H1B fees will impact IT Professionals and companies. The IT professionals of AP and Telangana are likely to get impacted most and it is important that the central government works closely with both state governments. While Hyderabad has been wooing several IT companies, companies have already shown interest in Andhra Pradesh. India has an opportunity to benefit from the current unpredictability and turbulence. While in the short run there could be problems, in the long run India could benefit from some of the global changes underway, as it has in the past from uncertain situations.

Third, it is important to make states, irrespective of the dispensation in power, stakeholders on not just FTA’s but also initiatives like Act East, Free and Open Indo-Pacific. Even in the context of ties with immediate neighbours, the centre and states need to work closely irrespective of the political dispensation in power in the states.

Finally, in the sphere of higher education there is need for greater cooperation. Several overseas universities are showing interest in developing campuses in different parts of India. Apart from this, the centre and states should also regularly discuss changing trends in the international higher education sector and the possible impact on states.

In conclusion, while there is no doubt that the trend of para-diplomacy has gained momentum in recent years, it is important to ensure that there are mechanisms facilitate strong centre-state coordination on issues pertaining to foreign policy. In  a changing economic and geopolitical situation, the role of states is bound to increase and it is important that this is successfully harnessed.

[i] Wyatt, A. (2017). “Paradiplomacy of India’s chief ministers”. India Review, 16(1), 106-124.

[ii] Daily News Analysis, “From 1990s till date, how ‘paradiplomacy’ gained momentum in India”, August 7, 2023. Tridivesh Singh Maini. Weblink: From 1990s till date, how ‘paradiplomacy’ gained momentum in India

[iii] L. Rudolph and S. Rudolph, “The Iconization of Chandrababu: Sharing Sovereignty in India’s Federal Market Economy,” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 36 No. 18 (2001), pp. 1541-1552.

[iv] See Wyatt A, 2017. Paradiplomacy of India’s Chief Ministers. P.106-107

[v] The Geopolitics, “India-UAE CEPA: How India’s States Are Tapping Potential Benefits”, March 2, 2024. Tridivesh Singh Maini. Weblink: India-UAE CEPA: How India’s States Are Tapping Potential Benefits – The Geopolitics

Authored by:
Tridivesh Singh Maini,
Assistant Professor,
Jindal School of International Affairs,
O.P. Jindal Global University,
Sonepat, Haryana

Related Intelligence

OPINIONSNOVEMBER 12, 2025
01

Between Washington and the Global South: The BRICS Balancing Act

Trump’s criticism of BRICS and warning to BRICS member states On October 14 2025 the US President, Donald Trump stated that the BRICS organisation was against the US Dollar (this is not the first time, that Trump has made such a claim). During a meeting with the Argentine Prime Minister Javier Milei at the White House, Trump also flagged the fact that he had warned BRICS member states, that he would impose tariffs on member states and that as a result many countries had pulled out of the organisation. Said the US President ‘They’re all dropping out of Brics. Brics was an attack on the dollar and I said, you want to play that game, I’m going to put tariffs on all of your products coming into the US. They said, like I said, we’re dropping out of Brics…They don’t even talk about it anymore.’ Russian President, Vladimir Putin while speaking at the Valdai Club (Sochi, Russia), on October 3, 2025 categorically stated that BRICS was not anti-dollar , but he also stated that his country faced sanctions and was left with no other option, but to trade with other countries in non-dollar-local currencies. Earlier this year Moscow had said that it had no intention of supporting a BRICS common currency . In recent months, ties between India — which will be holding the BRICS Presidency in 2026 -and USA have witnessed some hiccups due to two factors; First, the imposition of tariffs and Trump’s repeated claims that it was his personal intervention which led to the end of the India-Pakistan conflict in May 2025 (he repeated this claim). Even amidst these tensions, India has categorically distanced itself from the idea of a BRICS Common currency . In March 2025, India’s External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar had said : “Regarding the role of the dollar, we are realistic. We have no issue with the dollar… We have no interest in undermining the dollar” BRICS Members and trade in local currencies Like several other countries, India has been supporting the idea of trade in local currencies. Here it would be pertinent to point out, that India recently paid for the purchase of Russian Oil in Yuan recently . There have also been reports of China seeking to links its central bank digital currency (CBDC) to some Asian and Middle Eastern nations. There has been no official announcement by the People’s Bank of China or any other central banks of the country . While there is not an iota of doubt, that countries are looking at reducing dependence upon the US Dollar given the growing uncertainty in the global economic order and with the objective of circumventing US sanctions on Russia — in the aftermath of Russia-Ukraine war. Over 90% of Russia’s trade with China and India is in local currencies. While commenting on the same, Russia’s Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said: “..with our friends from China and India, we have already switched to national currencies by 90-95%. This is automatic, without any purpose, because they don’t allow settlements in the respective currency, which used to be the hegemonic one,’ BRICS is also moving towards setting up a BRICS payment system. While it is true, that intra-BRICS trade in local currencies has risen it would be premature to believe that BRICS payment system will emerge as an alternative to SWIFT. Not all countries are pushing for trade in local currencies with the intention of undermining the US Dollar as has been mentioned earlier. Expansion of BRICS and growing interest in the New Development Bank As a result of the prevailing uncertainty, several countries are showing greater interest in membership of BRICS. Four countries, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia and UAE secured membership of the BRICS in 2024. Indonesia joined BRICS as a member in 2025. Over 30 countries have applied for full membership of the organisation. BRICS also has 10 observer states — Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Uganda, Uzbekistan and Vietnam. All the 10 observer states have also applied for full membership of BRICS. More countries are also beginning to show interest in New Development Bank NDB. The NDB set up in 2015 provides financing for infrastructural development, energy, digital development and a gamut of other areas. Significantly, not all members of the NDB are members of BRICS and vice-versa. Indonesia, which entered BRICS in 2025 announced that it will be joining the NDB in March 2025 . The announcement was made during a meeting between Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto and Dilma Rousseff, President of the New Development Bank (NDB) on March 25, 2025. Rousseff while commenting on Indonesia’s decision to join the NDB said: “..Catching up to the advanced economies, in the era of fourth industrial and technological revolution, requires investment in technology and innovation, which are a common objective of NDB and Indonesia” Several Non-BRICS members are keen to join the NDB so that they can reduce their dependence upon western lending institutions. India’s presidency of BRICS While commenting on India’s role during it’s Presidency of BRICS, PM Modi speaking at the BRICS Summit, 2025 said : ‘Just as, during our G-20 chairmanship, we gave priority to the issues of the Global South in the agenda, similarly during our chairmanship of BRICS, we will take this forum forward in the spirit of people-centricity and humanity first’ India is likely to give a thrust to greater trade in local currencies between BRICS members and also showcase the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) network. While speaking at the BRICS Summit in 2024 at Kazan, PM Modi had stated : ‘We welcome efforts to increase financial integration among BRICS countries. Trade in local currencies and smooth cross-border payments will strengthen our economic cooperation. The Unified Payments Interface [UPI] developed by India is a huge success story and has been adopted in many countries,’ Conclusion It is true, that BRICS has its own set problems including differences between members over issues. The expansion of BRICS and the NDB will also come with

TR
Team Red Lantern AnalyticaAnalyst
arrow_outward